Moonhoax essays

Moonhoax essays In 1969, Neil Armstrong was the first man to walk on the moon. Or was he For the first time it is now, possible to present the compelling evidence that the Apollo 11 moon landing of July 20, 1969 was a hoax. There is plenty of evidence to support this contention.... Different questions have been raised about the footage taken on the moon, also the physical and technical impossibilities that surround the phony moon landing is substantial enough to prove it untrue. Not only that, the political situation between the U.S. and the Soviet Union was strained. When we look at photographs of the Apollo 11 mission, we see a range of errors. In all the pictures, the sky appears dark and starless. The moon has only one light source being the sun, the shadows on the pictures should be parallel, however, the shadows are not parallel, and there fore the images are faked. The non-parallel shadows probably came from the different light sources around the filming set. These light sources would explain why there are no deep, hoax shadows in any of the pictures. The shadows should be pitch black because there is no air on the moon to scatter the light; nevertheless, the objects in the shadows appear exceptionally clear. The crew members of Apollo 11 were not expert photographers, yet all the photographs we see are perfectly aligned and centered. This would be difficult even for a professional photographer considering the cameras were mounted on the chest of their spacesuit. This evidence alone is sufficient to confirm that it was all one big hoax. When the rocket left the moon to bring the astronauts back into orbit, there was no flame from the rocket. Obviously every rocket has a visible flame, which proves that the takeoff was faked. Some more recent evidence concerns radiation found in the Van Allen belts that surround the earth. Any passengers in a spacecraft as primitive as the Apollo 11 would have been subjected to deadly radiation as soo...